Once again the past month has seen a large number of important changes in VAT
legislation and administration. Some of these may present opportunities for
taxpayers to reclaim VAT from HM Customs & Excise
Toasted baguette sandwiches / Paninis
2 sandwich shops sold toasted baguette sandwiches for consumption off the
premises. HM Customs & Excise ruled that these were standard rated as hot food.
The companies appealed arguing that the sandwiches were not toasted so as to be
served warm but "to release the flavour of the ingredients and to make the bread
crisp". The fact that they were warm when sold was incidental. The Tribunal
agreed and ruled that the sandwiches are zero-rated.
Any businesses making similar sales may be entitled to submit reclaims for
overdeclared VAT going back 3 years. VATease can assist with such claims.
Distance Learning
The Court of Appeal has recently ruled that a supply of a distance learning
course including printed matter is a multiple supply of zero-rated printed
matter and exempt or standard-rated education.
Taxpayers who have previously treated such supplies as wholly exempt may be
entitled to recover additional input VAT. Those who have previously treated
supplies as wholly standard rated may be entitled to claim back some output
VAT from HM Customs & Excise.
Interest on Late Repayments
In a recent Tribunal case, HM Customs & Excise had delayed payment of an
amount due to a taxpayer. In addition to repayment supplement, the taxpayer
requested interest on the payment of 8%. Customs thought this to be excessive.
The Tribunal awarded an interest payment of 6.25%.
This will be of particular interest to dealers in mobile phones who may
currently have payments that are being excessively delayed whilst Customs
undertake investigations.
Joining a partnership / Issue of Shares - whether a supply
The ECJ has ruled that a contribution to a partnership by an incoming partner
is not a supply by the partnership upon which VAT is due. Where the
contribution is cash there are therefore no VAT considerations. However, where
the contribution is one of goods or services the incoming partner may be liable
to account for VAT on a deemed supply.
The ECJ case was recently used to argue that the issue of shares (similar,
it was stated, to a partner's contribution) is, therefore, also not a supply.
This would greatly improve the issuing company's ability to recover VAT on the
associated costs. HM Customs & Excise have issued a business brief refuting, in
no uncertain terms, this argument.
Reform of Tribunals including VAT & Duties
Possible major reforms of the Tribunals have been announced. They will merge
the VAT & Duties Tribunals with the General & Special Commissioners and the
Section 703 Tribunal. There will be 2 tiers with appeals from the first tiers
going to the second. Appeals from the second tier will go straight to the Court
of Appeal. Complex appeals can be made straight to the second tier.
Business Entertainment Fishing Letters
Customs have recently issued a large number of letters to suppliers of
"business entertainment" requesting details of supplies and customers. We
understand that Customs' HQ Policy Division have been embarrassed by the nature
of these letters and the way in which they were issued. VATease recommends that
anyone receiving one of these letters does not respond.
VAT Grouping Requirements Changes
In tandem with the VAT Avoidance Disclosure rules detailed in our last
newsletter and recent newsflash, there has been a change to the VAT Grouping
eligibility requirements. The changes will only affect VAT groups with income
of over £10 million and a group member that is owned or managed by a third party.
Details on the VAT Avoidance Disclosure rules can be found on the VATease
Website at http://www.vatease.co.uk/news/vat-avoidance-schemes.htm.
HM Customs & Excise's new website
Customs has unveiled a new-look website at http://www.hmce.gov.uk.
Unfortunately their internet servers are unable to cope with the load this has
caused and the site has been extremely slow or unavailable recently. It would
appear that addresses for pages on the old site are still valid if you replace
the "www" on the old URL with "ww2", i.e. http://ww2.hmce.gov.uk/.
Mobile Phone and Computer Chips
To combat VAT fraud the Government introduced legislation last year that
allowed HM Customs & Excise to hold anyone dealing in mobile phones or computer
chips jointly and severally liable for the VAT due to be declared by their
suppliers. Additionally, Customs can require any trader to provide a security
equal to input VAT being claimed if they deem it necessary for the protection
of the revenue.
Both of these items of legislation are being challenged through the courts by
the Federation of Technological Industries. Although the FTI recently won the
right to challenge these rules in the European Court, the judges that referred
the case made it clear that they did so because they believed an ECJ ruling
would strengthen Customs' position in the fight against VAT fraud.
Children's' Clothing
Despite the recent press hysteria about a burgeoning obesity problem amongst
the country's children, HM Customs & Excise and the Tribunal have refused to
allow oversized children's clothing to qualify for zero-rating and confirmed
current size guidelines.
Frivolous Appeals
A solicitor appealed against a VAT assessment by HM Customs & Excise but
failed to turn up at the hearing. The Tribunal dismissed his appeal, decreed
it to have been frivolous and ordered him to pay Customs costs of £2,300.
Option to Tax unit in Glasgow
The OTT unit in Glasgow currently has a significant backlog. It has issued
guidance on how to submit certain items. If you are required to seek written
permission from HM Customs & Excise before opting to tax a property, the OTT
Unit insists that you request permission in separate correspondence and await
approval before submitting the OTT notification.
If you are submitting an OTT as part of a request for VAT registration, the
OTT Unit insists that you send the notification to the VAT Registration Unit
together with your registration application.
Neither of these rules would appear to have any basis in law and may not be
enforceable by Customs.
Magic Mushrooms
The mainstream press has been full of reports recently that HM Customs &
Excise are insisting the sale of Magic Mushrooms, a fungus that can create a
hallucinogenic "trip", is subject to VAT at 17.5%. Customs are arguing that the
mushrooms are sold as a drug rather than as a zero-rated food. In truth, this
would appear to be a ruling given to one taxpayer and may not be relevant to all
sellers. The liability may depend upon how they are sold out for sale. At the
same time, the Home Office has said that the sale of the mushrooms may be
illegal which, if true, will mean they are not subject to VAT at all.
If you require further information please contact us on 0121 778 4299.
This newsletter is designed to keep readers abreast of
current developments. No liability is accepted for errors, omissions or opinions
it contains or for any reliance placed on this newsletter. This newsletter is intended
for general guidance only. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person
acting or refraining from action as a result of any material in this publication
can be accepted by the authors or publishers. On any specific matter, reference
should be made to the appropriate advisor.
© Copyright 2004 VATease Ltd